Joel Sherman
Five questions to determine if Mets can be Amazin'
Mar 18, 2003
The Mets are viewing the benches-clearing incident incited by Guillermo Mota's plunking of Mike Piazza as symbolic of their feistiness and unity. Except which team wouldn't go out en masse to stand by/protect their best player?
No, the true measure whether the Mets have truly changed from their coma state of 2002 will come with the onset of the regular season. That question cannot be answered until then. But these five actually could turn out to be just as pertinent:
1. Is the rotation worse than feared?
The addition of Tom Glavine was supposed to make this an area of strength for the Mets. But Glavine has pitched poorly this spring (11.68 ERA). Usually, you would ignore exhibition results for a pitcher as great as Glavine. However, he is 38 and he is coming off a poor second half and atrocious postseason. But even if the Glavine-Al Leiter combo is wonderful, the Mets still have legitimate concerns from 3-5 in the rotation.
 |
| Glavine's age and poor Spring Training should raise concern for the Mets. (AP) |
Pedro Astacio has pain in his already unsound shoulder and may not start the season on the roster. Steve Trachsel was re-enlisted for two years at $8 million in an offseason when pitchers of his pedigree went for far less on the market. The Mets may need two starters from among David Cone, Mike Bacsik, Aaron Heilman, Jason Middlebrook and Jae Seo. That doesn't feel right for a team with a $120 million payroll.
2. Can Roberto Alomar become a force again?
Alomar has talked a good game about being comfortable in his second year in New York and loving his surroundings. But he has mostly played lifeless during spring training or pretty much how he did during a sleep-walk in 2002. This is his walk year and you figured that would motivate him. Art Howe has said a player like Alomar turns it on when the season begins. Boy, do the Mets need their manager to be right about that because play like this from Alomar could undermine the whole team.
3. Can the Mets make a deal before the season?
They would love to add a more sure-thing starting pitcher, but those kinds of guys are not usually available in March. They are still being linked to Florida third baseman Mike Lowell, though they seem content to go with Ty Wigginton. The bigger item is if they can move Jeromy Burnitz. San Diego and Baltimore would seem the only possible destinations. The Mets would love to remove as much of Burnitz's $11.5 million contract as possible, open a corner outfield slot for Roger Cedeno and potentially get a player back that is more helpful overall than Burnitz.
4. How much will the defense hurt?
 |
| New York would love to slide as much of Burnitz's hefty contract as possible. (AP) |
Aside from Rey Sanchez and Alomar if he is into things, the Mets are no better than average any place on the diamond and far worse than that in most places. The ugly defensive play last year during the exhibition schedule was shrugged off as no big thing because it was spring training. But it was a key in undermining the Mets' confidence during the season. Aside from Leiter and Armando Benitez, the Mets are not blessed with strikeout pitchers. They need the defense to make plays, especially in April to set a tone.
5. What will the back of the bullpen look like?
This is not a throwaway issue. The Mets also are not blessed with horses in the rotation. They are going to need good work from relievers beyond the sure four of Benitez, Mike Stanton, Scott Strickland and David Weathers. It seems Graeme Lloyd has pushed himself into the second lefty role in the pen, which would bode poorly for Jamie Cerda or Pedro Feliciano making the staff. With Astacio almost certain to begin the season on the DL, the Mets could have Cone, Bacsik and Middlebrook all make the team, with two in the rotation and one available for a very important long relief spot. Seo also has thrust himself into that competition.
|